That fact that Sneak-a-Peak wasn't Bicycle backed kind of scared me off of the trick. I was wondering if anyone thinks the same? Maxwell, will you stock a Bicycle version? Are they in production yet?

Yeah, me too. Seems kinda dumb. I mean here you are doing card tricks for someone and you have to change to a different backed deck just to do 1 trick? Of course people are going to be suspicious of the deck...what we're they thinking when they made this deck? You can't even do a deck switch because the backs are different!!! It's OK if you just do 1 card trick...but who does just 1 card trick at a time?

the svengali deck has the same effect sort of only the backs don't change from blue to red.

Plus the illusion isn't very strong.... i personaly wasn't to floored when OZ performed it...

I thought Oz performed it well.

oz preformed it well.it would of mad the trick even better if had the same backs...and an nother flaw you only can do the queen the same card.but the rules are only show a trick one or two times.in this case sneek a peek is once to the same person.

are you serious?????? you can only do one card??

The whole thing behind it is... well. I won't mention it. But I'll give you a hint, it only works with one card. it isn't a gimmick. Like.. you can't use a 2 of Spades, and a Jack of Clubs for Sneak-A-Peak, if you do it twice, you have to use the same card twice. (If you follow).

yes, u can only use one card, but dont worry there is hardly any sleights involved!

I heard it was on some cheap
stock

Might want to watch out with the stereotypes. Just a tip.