JaredGill wrote:
I wasn't congratulating him...I was being sarcastic, otherwise I wouldn't lock down the thread.
Sarcastic, and how was anyone supposed to know that? It looked to me, and I am guessing to anyone else, that you thought it was funny, and didn't want anyone else responding. It would have been far better to post a message saying that crap like that message wouldn't be tolerated, and then locked the thread. Don't you think?
I would say the same if it was a fake Santini, this is not personal. Its about professionalism.
If it was a fake me, then we would be talking about a court case now. penguin magic are ultimately responsable for the content here. If it is slanderous, then they could end up in court. If it was me, then thats exactly where they WOULD end up.
JaredGill wrote:
You guys need to sort your differences elsewhere privately. We surely do not need this kind of crap here and we surely don't need to deal with your flamings and arguments.
I do not, in any way at all, understand what you have said above! What differences? Arguments? Flaming? When have I ever had anything to do with any of that here, once ever, at all? Check my ip, then check it against every post ever made here if you like. I have a static ip, have never posted here, and have nothing to do with any arguments or any differences. There is no flaming or arguments in this thread, we have totally agreed with each other! So what are you talking about? There is lots of that in other threads. But not here. Its kind of the point of my message. Did you miss that?
Again, there is none of that in this thread. So what are you talking about? Its like you are responding to an entirely different message.
My conclusion. You need to take control of a forum you are SUPPOSED to be moderating. You need to keep your personal opinions AWAY from that job, and you need to clean up the mess in this forum..
Oh, and with a reply like you have just given. You ought also to look up posterior and humorous in a medical book, and learn the difference.
EDIT. After I entered the above response, you edited your message and added this...
JaredGill wrote:
P.S. My last paragraph shows that I agree with you.
So I have no idea where we are now

However the tone of my response is based entirely on the idea that the message you left is aimed at me. Which therefore means you feel I have something to do with flaming and arguements, and even seems to accuse me of taking part. If you did not mean it that way, then apologies in advance for the harshness.