Well I disagree. I think David Blaine did a really awesome christian like deed. And I dont think God thought it was weird, I'm pretty sure he was happy. So if its not wrong in Gods eyes, it is not wrong in mine. He showed the picture, to show us the expression of how happy the guy was,
Look, I'm not saying helping out some homeless guy wasn't a great thing to do. I'm not trying to that Blaine is some sort of pervert, either. I'm just saying that the picture doesn't show the best of judgment. I'm sure the guy was just as happy at other moments or from another angle.
God didn't need the picture as proof. He also didn't need the account to be published in a book for Blaine to get credit. Blaine did that to get credit for it from us. If Blaine helped the guy out of the goodness of his heart, then great. But if he did it because it would make himself look good in his book, then I'd be less impressed.
what, you have never seen a naked guy before? C'Mon grow up.
You are mistakenly assuming that I was offended by the picture, which misses my point entirely. If it doesn't seem odd to you, fine. I really didn't set out to convince anyone, but rather I just wanted to find out what other people thought about it.
I find the "grow up" comment ironic, though, since part of growing up is learning what is and isn't appropriate.