i read the on foot description again...and what im wondering is why couldnt it be the one DC does..instead of making it appear on his own shoe he could make it appear on a baby shoe...well let me know your input....here is the description "The Miracle Ring on Shoelace. The magician borrows a spectator's finger ring and places it under a handkerchief. The ring can be seen and felt by the spectator until the very last second, when the handkerchief falls open and the ring has completely vanished! Moments later, the magician points to his shoe and the spectator's ring is seen hanging from one of the loops in his laces! The loop is untied and the spectator himself slides the ring off the lace!" this is what DC does but instead it is on a babies'shoe instead....well ill tell ya what..im buying it then we'll find out for sure.. let me know what you think..... one last question...is fast and loose really worth it..im not sure if i wanna pay 40 dollars for a chain...cause im pretty sure its a normal chain and its just sleight of hand.....so let me know....thanks again nick white usmc scout sniper

Well, I know that nobody could have worn that baby shoe that DC used (even a baby), because of the way it worked. I'm applying the same thinking to On Foot, if it works on a similar principal you couldn't wear the shoe. That's why I believe the method isn't the same. Also if the method was similar you probably wouldn't have to cover the ring with a hank (I have a feeling that's an important part of the trick). Of course I could be wrong, let me know when you get it. m@gician.us

no problem david..i ordered it yesterday...im overseas though with the 31rst marine expeditionary unit..so itll be a couple of weeks till i get it..but ill email you and let you know... so do you know about fast and loose...sleight of hand..or the chain..(i think sleight of hand)b

Yes, it's sleight of hand