Ok... it seems I was misunderstood again
in this case. So this is gonna be a long post I think... just trying to make some things clear for everybody
who ever misunderstood me here, ok? I mean I really don't know if it's because of my limited ability to be articulate in english, or if the words I look up in the dictionary have another meaning than I think in the moment... or if it's just that people don't judge me by what I say, but only by the word "Loyal". Whatever, I think it's just a communication problem, so let's go through every point and let me explain what I mean.
You'll learn that adjones is the least likely person to want to start an argument.
I don't know anybody here personally, but I guess that you're right that adjones didn't meant his comment as provocative as I took it. He got me in the wrong moment, so I'm sorry if my reaction sounded a little *bleep*ed-off. I'm just so tired of being judged by being a Loyal constantly. This is only one
part of my personality. However, I didn't want to sound cruel.
What he's trying to point out is that you're calling others "narrow minded" and "ignorant", but are doing the same by not budging an inch on Criss.
That's definitely not true. Let me first explain what I meant by "narrow-minded": in this case thecooltonto gave me the opinion that in his eyes Criss can do no right, is not able to do anything
without camera editing, and was extremely doubting the prove (Guinness Book record) I offered, without an own research- because he's prejudiced against him. I completely understand that the other side is narrow-minded as well, those who claim things like Criss never
used camera editing or can do no wrong, just because they are fans of his and believe every word he says to be true. But how did I ever give you the opinion that I
were one of those people? To this point, I was only talking about facts and how they built my opinion in this case. Maybe I should mention now that to be loyal doesn't necessarily mean to idealize a person and like everything he says and does. To be loyal means to show firm and constant support to somebody, even though he makes mistakes and has a side which is not so adorable. I never claimed anything different, did I? I admitted he used camera editing, for example- and was just offering facts to show that in this case
he didn't need any. I affirm to be a very open-minded person. Before I make an opinion about anything, I try to understand every angle, research for facts, think about different possibilities and so on.
The ambulence part was BS though. Kinda weird when a paramedic looks and has the same name as your costume designer.
Just got curious about that and watched that part again. But I don't know who you mean, the faces of the paramedics are not shown close-up and not mentioned with names?
I quote this dialogue because you quoted it in this context, miniserb725. Is this the point you meant by saying I would not "budge an inch on Criss"? Then this was a misunderstanding again- and again the only reason I can think of is the word "Loyal" in my name, but I already responded to that.
Why do I think you jugded my question by it? Because it was only a factual question, a neutral
question! Or maybe the word "curious" was wrong? Should I have used "inquisitive"? Look, if I were narrow-minded enough to think what alexo wrote couldn't be true, I wouldn't even have replied to it. It's only that when I hear something and I get interested in if it's true or not, I do a research. In this case I watched the certain part of the video again and couldn't find the person alexo meant, so I asked- hoping for a factual answer, something like "it's that guy there, you can find the name here". That's how I would answer such a question. And btw., why should I actually want to start an argumentation with alexo? What he wrote about the metamorphosis confirmed what I was saying before, I am glad that he has seen it in a live show and in this context knows that what I was trying to say before is true.EDIT:
I just dislike when people pointlessly go back and forth about something and neither will admit that the other is right about anything.
We share this opinion, and I hope you now understand that this was exactly what I meant as well.