why did u change 2 your "normal" name? want 2 make your posting look more serious? seing a neccessarity for this?
well, i thought so that u do not understand the content of my last longer posting.. how 2 xplain it this simple that also u understand????
mayb like this:
what u called circular logic is nothing elz than making a thesis and than proving it.. if u really have been at university u should know about constructing and testing thesis.. cool down, check your own description of what u wrote and compare it with hypothesis-test-standards.. i gave u also a method 2 meassure your own thesis.. did u not understand what u meassure with the sort of counting i described? at least it should not need 2 much intellectual power 2 understand..
anyhow: u wrote i took your statements out of context.. name a SINGLE xample for this thesis.. u also were not able 2 name a SINGLE conrete logical mistake of mine.. again just some phrases - no evidence as no naming of mistake is possible.. so call me master of prediction as i predicted this point of your reaction in advance.. a puppateer barlyn miracle??????
anyhow: seems that u did not really read what i wrote but more tried 2 c it from a fixed conclusion u do not want 2 quit.. 2 bring an xample: u wrote that i stated "or that we hate everyone who isn't like us".. well i wrote: "i do not think that u r haters".. so can u b much more wrong in reading what i wrote?
also: u wrote about "complicated ideas" i am coming up with.. what complicated ideas???? as i wrote above u make it complicated for yourself by not wanna c that your old conclusion about me is wrong.. just meassure how i xplained in before-posting your own thesis of me being lazy e.g. - it is not difficult, not complicated.. so if u fail with understanding it is cause u make it complicated for yourself.. thats why i wrote take a step back for a moment.. u c: if u seddle down u will understand like others did with eas..
or just take a look at what u write by yourself: my style should not b tolerated.. so u write 1. that it is my (different) style and 2. that u are not a tolerate kind of person towards my style.. now go on reading what i wrote in last long posting about people being different and people having strong dissympathies against people beeing different / with different habbits, behaviour, styles.. again: it is not this difficult 2 understand..
another point u messed up logically with is the statement: that i wrote u and bucki would b "uneducated".. i did not write this.. i wrote that from what u write it seems like u have a "emtionalized sort of perception" and thats not the way of thinking thats tought at university/ not the university style of perception.. this emtionalized sort of perception is what disables u 2 understand what i am writing..
i wrote several times in this post: step back and cool down.. seddle your emos.. u state by yourself that u 1. want me writing "normal", 2. write that i have a different style (behaving / beeing different), 3. call me cause of my style "lazy", "delusion" and "stupid".. now add 1. and 2. and 3. and come up 2 our own conclusion.. it is not a crime not beeing normal.. it is not even bad not beeing "normal".. it is just different not beeing "normal".. thats all.. no big deal..
at least: u write that individualisation is only about what u think not about how u behave.. this is wrong again.. hey man, i wrote my docoral study about individualisation from economic perspective.. do u wanna tell me i would not know about individualization???? of course u are also individual (enhanced dergee of individualization) cause of your style of clothing (no opinion), habbits, gesture, dancing etc.. hey man, what srewed up thesis do u wanna write at next? individualization means writing, dancing, talking and thinking like all tha "normal" guys?
mayb it helps u if u try 2 get a few xamples in our next post for things u wanna assume me having written.. or for your own thesis.. get concrete and u c the nonsens u quote.. sorry for the wording but u are so resistand towards logic that i do not know how 2 name it elz..
as i just c: last point: of cause my style xist.. u just read it.. check rappers etc. (teens write different xcept they are influenced by rappers etc.): there u will find the style again.. anyhow: funny move: i do not like the style of u so it does not xist..
cmon.. b honest: have u really been at university and if so: did u finish it with xams or graduation or have u been there for a couple of semesters and gave up? no shame if u did so..