This trick is confusing and overly complicated. But what really bugs me is that a better, simpler
and easier to execute solution is already known to the author, and yet he still decides to publish
this.
If it’s not clear from the trailer, here’s the effect: two folded-in-quarters cards
of contrasting colors and held together by a small bulldog clip are introduced to the audience and
laid aside. A card is selected from a deck that matches one of the clipped cards. The selection is
signed and lost in the deck. When the clipped cards are revealed, the card of contrasting color
matches the selected card, and the remaining card proves to be the actual, signed card!
Why?? Why are there two cards? Is it because that makes for a stronger effect? No. It’s because
the method requires it. And the effect, therefore, suffers. It’s confusing. Worse, however, is that
Jay Sankey’s “Paperclipped” accomplishes the exact same effect, but with one card, freely selected
(the effect in “The Bulldog” requires a force), and without the awkward manipulation that’s
necessary to get the card in position. Everything about this method is obnoxious. It’s a step
backward, and a big one.
Jay Sankey would roll over in his grave, if he saw this, if he
were dead. He’s not, but this just might kill him.
Dickinson also teaches the slip force
and the depth illusion (without credit to Vernon or Marlo). The aforementioned force ranks as one of
the worst and most well-known forces among non-magicians who know one trick. I do not recommend this
force.
I 100% appreciate your feedback so please don't think the following is aimed as a negative towards you personally, only your words.
The card doesn't have to be forced, you're just refusing to think for yourself. Instead of looking at Bulldog as a tool, you are looking only at the suggested routines.
It's also different to paper clipped (i'm a paper clipped fan), but with routining the outcome can be a completely different routine. You can actually build countless amounts of routines using two cards.
Dickinson does teach a slip force, but why Cowles? Because if the 'magician' watching doesn't already know a force then I can only presume that individual is a beginner. It would be silly to teach my variation of the classic force to somebody who doesn't know a force already. It was simply to help them get off the ground.
All with positivity.
Best wishes,
Joel.
I have to agree with this review. Of all the tricks that I have purchased from Joel Dickinson (most are brilliant), this one left me cold.
I was VERY disappointed.
There is no mention that the card must be forced in the trailer - it must be.
I consider this to be the most deceptive (read between the lines “rip-off”) trailer that I have seen in the last 3 years.
If after reading the above review, you still want to purchase the trick, you will at least know the drawbacks that come with it.
I will NEVER perform this trick - that is how disappointed I am with it...