> The Poker Test by Erik Casey

Needs Some Fine Tuning Report this review
Pro Privacy ON (login to see reviewer names) on September 21st, 2014
You would think that if someone had the capability to put together an instructional DVD for their trick that they would do it until they came up with a PERFECT, error free copy for distribution, right?! Well, they almost never do and it is really disturbing. Because unlike a written set of instructions you have to skip all around, using trial and error and gobs of time, trying to find what you are looking for: IF it even exists!! This DVD falls into that group. My trick came with 7 gimmicked cards. It was not until the very end of the DVD that it was casually mentioned that 2 of the cards were extra, just in case. Only 5 are to be used performing the trick!! Gads! Also, you need to supply 5 additional cards in order to do this illusion!! For $20, why couldn't they do that for us? Even though the process is useful it is not a new discovery as I have seen it used before. My trouble with this illusion was that there are two steps involved that were glossed over that I felt needed a more detailed explanation. The first was fanning the cards. Eric could do it very well, BUT, if you cannot do it well the entire illusion is blown. He just assumed we could all do that. Second, a card has to be moved from the bottom to the top of your stack of cards at one point to cap off the final illusion. As far as I was concerned, how to do this properly was not explained well at all. Another funny thing. A modified illusion using the gimmick was presented at the very end of the DVD. For some reason they opted NOT to show you how to do it, but instead mentioned that you could figure it out for yourself if you felt so inclined!! With proper editing and a more concise DVD with more attention given to the details this could have been a 5 star illusion.

Report this comment
JimDiGritz
Feb 18th 2015 9:21am
I kind of agree, the DVD is not the clearest and jumps around a lot.

That said the fan is super simple, I'm no cardistry expert but I've never once fluffed it (yet!).

I also don't really like the presentation effect of starting with the blank cards. Personally I feel that starting with blanks instantly gets the spectator thinking that your deck is not normal (remember most people have NEVER SEEN a blank playing card!).

Instead I start with a royal flush and then show that they missed that one of the flush was actually blank, I then reveal that I was actually using auto-suggestion all along and that they are in fact all blank.

Then the final prestige is the fact that I convinced them that the deck was red when it was actually blue!

Works better for me!

Add a comment
Bestsellers
See all bestsellers



Act Builder beta



     Get To Know Us

     Shipping and Store Policies

     Need Help?

Home | About Penguin Magic | The Penguin Foundation

Mail orders: Penguin Magic, 3299 Monier Circle, Unit A, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Call us at 800-880-2592 | International Dial: +1 707-317-6733

© 2002-2023 Penguin Magic. All Rights Reserved.
We hope you found the magic tricks you were looking for!